Which of the following is an example of a compensatory treatment for aphasia?

A compensatory treatment for aphasia is focused on strategies that help an individual enhance communication abilities despite their language deficits. Partner approaches fit this definition well, as they involve strategies that communication partners can use to facilitate better understanding and interaction, providing support to help the individual with aphasia communicate more effectively. This may include things like simplifying language, using non-verbal cues, or providing context to aid comprehension.

In contrast, Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) and Constraint-Induced Language Therapy (CILT) are therapeutic techniques aimed at improving language production and are therefore considered more direct interventions to enhance language skills rather than compensatory strategies. Word-finding treatments, while helpful, focus primarily on improving specific language deficits related to vocabulary retrieval, which does not align with the concept of compensation for communication.